Business & Finance
Division
BPR Notes
October 19, 2005
Attendees: Patsy Barr, Patricia
Durrough, Dan Lewis, Tom Mackel, Jerry Mock,
Robin
Mullinix, Cathy Osborne, Mike Renfrow, Stephanie Rooks
Absent: Bill Gauthier, Bob Watkins
- Notes from BPR meeting of 9-14-05
meeting were distributed on 10-18-05.
- Current division BPR
efforts in process:
|
BPR
|
Department
|
Members
|
Status
|
Impact
|
|
Document Management
|
B&F Division
|
Dan Lewis - Tricia Durrough, Patsy Barr, Robin Mullinix, Stephanie Rooks, Bob Watkins
|
-Template has been designed for 6/22/05
meeting.
-Shredding Bins: 9 purchased overall -
2 being used in B&F.
-10/4/05: Inventories have
been received from all areas except for BITS & Public Safety
|
-Increased storage space.
-Secured disposal
-Conformity to BOR
Guidelines
|
|
Customer Service
|
B&F Division
|
Patsy Barr – Stephanie Rooks, Tricia
Durrough, Dan Lewis
|
- 9/19/05: Meeting
reviewed survey design, frequency, and training needs.
See Meeting Notes
following Agenda.
|
-Measurement of customers.
-Continuous Improvement.
-Conformity to SACS
requirements.
|
|
Budget Management Systems,
reporting (Columbus Model)
|
Budget
|
Tricia Durrough
|
- 12/15/04: Mr. Gauthier stated that
this is totally dependent on OIIT. He plans to follow-up with William Bowes
on 3/3/05.
- 03/30/05: On hold pending BOR
action.
|
|
|
Time and Attendance
|
Human Resource
|
Stephanie Rooks
|
- Met with Kronos T&A
representatives
- Funds budgeted
- Develop committee to
review generic issues.
- To be addressed at CBO
meeting on 3/3/05.
-3/30/05: On hold pending
BOR action
|
|
Note: As indicated, BPR’s on
Budget Management and Time and Attendance are “on hold” pending BOR action.
- Document Management – With the exception of BITS and Public Safety,
inventories were submitted by all B&F areas. Robin Mullinix and Tom
Mackel indicated that they would send this to Dan electronically. Jerry Mock
mentioned that even though most areas achieved the target date, there may
be more time required to analyze the information.
-
Dan stated that the Campus Records
Management Committee (RMC) has met twice in the last month and they are
reviewing the existing forms that are available for records management. After
examining the template that was designed by Robin for our area, the RMC is
considering using something similar for the other divisions. Dan also stated
the RMC is evaluating the current process for record destruction, outside
storage, and the existing forms that are listed on the IRP website to determine
if the process can be simplified.
“Completing
an inventory of our documents using the BOR series guidelines is a significant
step in this process” said Dan. “Those areas that are holding onto convenience
copies may begin to assess whether it is necessary to retain them since we
now have identified those areas that are responsible for the original copies.”
- Customer Service - The committee on Customer Service met and their
recommendations were reviewed by the BPR committee. The following points
were discussed:
- Mike
Renfrow indicated that if a professional consultant is contracted, all B&F
personnel should attend. John Roessler endorsed that request indicating that
most consultants can customize their messages depending on the area they are
speaking to. Stephanie Rooks emphasized that whoever is selected has to be motivational
– otherwise, the attendees will lose focus on the purpose of the seminar.
Following, are BPR’s that
have been submitted for the current fiscal year from the designated B&F
areas:
|
BPR
|
Department
|
Members
|
Status
|
Impact
|
|
B&F Website
|
Division
|
Jerry Mock – Robin
Mullinix, Bill Gauthier
|
Enhance current website for
effective customer usage.
|
|
|
Equipment Inventory
|
Public Safety
|
Tom Mackel -
|
Improve accessibility and
information on PS equipment.
|
|
|
Communications
|
Public Safety
|
Tom Mackel -
|
Improve on PS Dept.
abilities in Hispanic communication.
|
|
|
Fire Evacuation Plans
|
CP&F – RM/EHS
|
Matt Jordan - Robin Mullinix
|
Conversion of existing
plans from CAD format to Visio 2003.
Completed.
|
-Compatibility issue
resolved.
-Increased efficiency
-Continuity maintained
-Future corrections
minimized.
|
|
Worker's Compensation
|
CP&F – RM/EHS
|
Unassigned
|
Communication loop between
employee, employer, spouse-parent, treating physician, DOAS, and Human
Resources.
|
|
|
Building Inspections
|
CP&F – RM/EHS
|
Unassigned
|
Time intensive, unable to
perform inspections according to schedule and unable to perform on-site
follow-up to verify work has been completed. Communication.
|
|
|
Asbestos Management
|
CP&F – RM/EHS
|
Unassigned
|
Identification and sampling
of materials, documentation of results and surveys, communication with
building occupants and facilities and grounds employees, maintenance of
training.
|
|
|
Vehicle Accident
Investigation/Claims
|
CP&F – RM/EHS
|
Unassigned
|
Obtaining police reports,
communication with vehicle owner and DOAS or other insurance agent,
documentation and follow-up.
|
|
|
Data Collection and Reports
|
CP&F – F&G
|
Unassigned
|
We are now updating our
technology to better serve the University in the area of work data collection
and report generation.
|
|
|
Operational services
|
CP&F – F&G
|
Unassigned
|
Review of operational
performance with-in our Custodial and Landscape departments.
|
|
|
Administrative Staff
Support
|
CP&F – F&G
|
Unassigned
|
As noted in our
"Return to Work" BPR - An annual evaluation is necessary.
|
|
|
BPR
|
Department
|
Members
|
Status
|
Impact
|
|
Planning For Long Range Development of the Campus
|
CP&F – CP&D
|
Unassigned
|
Opportunities for improvement
involve the more effective use of overall Campus preplanning related to
updating the Physical Master Plan by involvement of professional consultants
early on and incorporating the process in our procedures.
|
|
|
Operational services
|
CP&F – F&G
|
Unassigned
|
Process review of
privatitized operations. University Suites, Apartments, etc.
|
|
|
Operational services
|
CP&F – F&G
|
Unassigned
|
A cross functional department
review of Vandalism and impact on Budgets, Retention, and Student
satisfaction.
|
|
|
Programming & Design
Phases of Construction Projects
|
CP&F – CP&D
|
Unassigned
|
Opportunities for improvement
include the decision making process during preplanning in developing the
proper delivery method best suited for each project as well as better
communication and involvement of our clients in program development of the
project. Developing our procedures to reflect and aid in this process would
be key.
|
|
|
Construction Administration
|
CP&F – CP&D
|
Unassigned
|
Opportunities for improvement
would be to somehow find ways to process projects, contracts, and
change-order requests through the BOR Office of Facilities in an expedient
manner.
|
|
|
Construction Project
Management
|
CP&F – CP&D
|
Unassigned
|
Opportunities for
improvement are in the area of project management, developing a good
contractor base, schedule improvements, assuring quality control, management
of construction activity and progress, and documentation during the construction
process.
|
|
|
Maintenance of Facility
Information
|
CP&F – CP&D
|
Unassigned
|
Opportunities for improvement
would include improving the efficiency of document retention and retrieval of
all documents that are necessary and required. This may include electronic
filing, providing additional space, relocation of stored materials, leasing
of space for archived documents, professionally contracted document storage,
or a combination of the above.
|
|
|
Agency Accounts
|
Purchasing
|
Unassigned
|
There are currently no
policies and procedures provided by the USG to provide guidance as to how
these funds can be used nor what funds can go into these accounts.
There are also tax issues related to these accounts.
|
|
The
directors from the remaining B&F areas indicated that they would email
their BPR’s to Dan Lewis by the end of the week.
A
schedule will need to be developed so that each area can prioritize those BPR’s
they will address each year.
- DRAC
Stephanie
reported that no further action has been taken since the last meeting.
- B&F Website
Jerry
Mock reviewed some of the changes that are being considered and presented us
with a design that was patterned after the one that was used for both the
President’s office and the VP for University Advancement. Jerry requested that
each department compile a list of key words or services that they will want to
associate with their area. Jerry requested that we send this to him by
November 10th.
- Adjournment
The
Meeting adjourned at 11:45 a.m. The next BPR meeting is scheduled for November
16, 2005 at 10:00 a.m.
Dl
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Customer Service Committee
September 19, 2005
Present: Tricia Durrough, Stephanie Rooks, Dan Lewis, and
Patsy Barr
Charge: To
define the method and frequency of customer service surveys for the Division of
Business & finance, and other customer service issues
Surveys have been conducted for the following areas with the
Division:
|
Department
|
Last Survey
|
Next Scheduled
|
|
Controller
|
November, 2004
|
FY2007
|
|
Human Resources
|
December, 2004
|
FY2007
|
|
Budget
|
October, 2004
|
FY2007
|
|
Student Financial Services
|
March, 2005
|
FY2006
|
|
Auxiliary Enterprises (Faculty/Staff only)
|
January, 2005
|
FY2007
|
|
Public Safety
|
November, 2005
|
FY2006
|
|
Facilities/Campus Planning
|
FY2004
|
November, 2005
|
|
Internal Audit
|
|
FY2007
|
|
BITS (internal to B&F)
|
FY2006 (informal)
|
FY2007
|
|
Auxiliary (Students)
|
|
FY2006
|
The committee recommends that one survey directed to faculty
and staff be used for all areas within the Division and a second survey be used
to target students. The single faculty/staff survey would have subdivisions
for the departments of Controller, Budget, Internal Audit, Human Resources,
Auxiliary Enterprises, Public Safety, and Facilities/Campus Planning. The
faculty/staff survey should be conducted every 2 years.
The student survey should be conducted annually and combined
for Student Financial Services, Human Resources, Cashiers, Public Safety, Mail
Services, Bookstore, Higher One, and Facilities.
The committee also recommends:
·
the number of questions be reduced (possibly 5 key customer
service questions), but that a comments section be increased. Questions should
be aimed at exploring “How can we improve?”
·
the survey be titled and a brief description given to identify
the survey as being for the Division of Business & Finance, and the purpose
and frequency of the surveys. Stress should be placed on providing feedback on
ways to improve.
·
the surveys should be sent out in October or February.
The committee also recommends that the Division conduct a
customer services training session led by an outside consultant. It would be
important to find a dynamic consultant so that employees would not feel their
time is wasted. The training session should be required for all Business &
Finance employees except personnel in Operation & Maintenance. It is
suggested that Aycock be closed for the approximate 90 minute session. Two
separate sessions could be conducted if necessary, but it is felt that more
benefit would be derived from all attending together.